Skip to content

refactor: parse response by xml path in http collect #5

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 25 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

arvi18
Copy link

@arvi18 arvi18 commented Apr 21, 2025

What's changed?

Checklist

  • I have read the Contributing Guide
  • I have written the necessary doc or comment.
  • I have added the necessary unit tests and all cases have passed.

Add or update API

  • I have added the necessary e2e tests and all cases have passed.

@arvi18
Copy link
Author

arvi18 commented Apr 21, 2025

👍👍hi, how we use in monitor template yml script, can you give an example?
eg:

    protocol: http
    http:
      host: ^_^host^_^
      port: ^_^port^_^
      url: ^_^base_path^_^/metrics/jvm.threads.states
      method: GET
      ssl: ^_^ssl^_^
      authorization:
        type: Basic Auth
        basicAuthUsername: ^_^username^_^
        basicAuthPassword: ^_^password^_^
      parseType: jsonPath
      parseScript: '$.availableTags[?(@.tag == "state")].values[*]'

@arvi18
Copy link
Author

arvi18 commented Apr 21, 2025

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 21, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@visz11 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 26 minutes and 2 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b02837b and 225157a.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • collector/src/main/java/org/apache/hertzbeat/collector/collect/http/HttpCollectImpl.java (1 hunks)
  • manager/src/main/resources/define/app-springboot3.yml (1 hunks)

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@visz11
Copy link
Collaborator

visz11 commented Apr 21, 2025

@coderabbitai full review

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 21, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Full review triggered.

@visz11
Copy link
Collaborator

visz11 commented Apr 24, 2025

/gemini review

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request introduces XML parsing functionality to the hertzbeat collector, which enhances its ability to monitor applications exposing metrics in XML format. The code is generally well-structured and includes error handling. However, there are areas where improvements can be made to enhance robustness and maintainability.

Summary of Findings

  • Error Handling in XML Parsing: The current error handling for XML parsing catches all exceptions and sets the code and message in the builder. It might be beneficial to differentiate between different types of exceptions for more granular error reporting.
  • Missing XML Path Validation: The code does not validate the XML path provided in app-springboot3.yml. If an invalid path is provided, the code might not return any values without indicating an error. Consider adding validation or more specific error handling for invalid paths.

Merge Readiness

The pull request is almost ready for merging. Addressing the high severity issue related to XML path validation and considering the medium severity suggestion for more granular error handling would improve the robustness of the code. I am unable to approve this pull request, and recommend that others review and approve this code before merging. At a minimum, the high severity issue should be addressed before merging.

Comment on lines +215 to +223
parseScript:
- alias: activeThreads
path: /status/threads/active
- alias: inactiveThreads
path: /status/threads/inactive
- alias: usedMemory
path: /status/memory/used
- alias: totalMemory
path: /status/memory/total

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

The path values under parseScript are used to extract data from the XML response. However, there is no validation to ensure these paths are valid or exist in the XML structure. If a path is incorrect, the collector might not return any values without indicating an error. Consider adding validation or more specific error handling for invalid paths.

Comment on lines +352 to +357
} catch (Exception e) {
String errorMsg = "Error parsing XML response: " + e.getMessage();
log.error(errorMsg, e);
builder.setCode(CollectRep.Code.FAIL);
builder.setMsg(errorMsg);
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Consider catching specific exceptions instead of a general Exception to provide more informative error messages and handle different error scenarios appropriately. For example, SAXException or IOException could be caught separately to provide specific error messages related to XML parsing or IO issues.

        } catch (SAXException e) {
            String errorMsg = "Error parsing XML: " + e.getMessage();
            log.error(errorMsg, e);
            builder.setCode(CollectRep.Code.FAIL);
            builder.setMsg(errorMsg);
        } catch (IOException e) {
            String errorMsg = "Error reading XML: " + e.getMessage();
            log.error(errorMsg, e);
            builder.setCode(CollectRep.Code.FAIL);
            builder.setMsg(errorMsg);
        } catch (ParserConfigurationException e) {
            String errorMsg = "Error configuring XML parser: " + e.getMessage();
            log.error(errorMsg, e);
            builder.setCode(CollectRep.Code.FAIL);
            builder.setMsg(errorMsg);
        } catch (Exception e) { // General exception
            String errorMsg = "Error parsing XML response: " + e.getMessage();
            log.error(errorMsg, e);
            builder.setCode(CollectRep.Code.FAIL);
            builder.setMsg(errorMsg);
        }

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants